Sunday, October 8, 2006

THE JOY OF TEXT 3

Writing on the Landscape:

“Like drawing a picture in the air with your finger …” [1]

 

The first time I saw Jacques Derrida (it must have been in 1962) he was walking fast and sure along a mountain’s crest, from left to right, I was at Arachon, I was reading (it must have been Force et signification), from where I was i could see him clearly advancing black on the clear sky, feet on a tightrope, the crest was terribly sharp, he was walking along the peak, from far away I saw it, his hike along the line between mountain and sky which were melting into each other, he had to travel a path no wider than a pencil stroke.
 
He wasn’t running, fast, he was making his way all the way along the crests.  Going from left to right, according to the (incarnate) pace of writing.  Landscape without any border other than, at each instant, displacing him from his pace.  Before him, nothing but the great standing air.  I had never seen someone from our century write like this, on the world’s cutting edge, the air had the air of a transparent door, so entirely open one had to search for the stiles [...] [2]
 
Writing as walking, landscape as language.  Topography and text intertwine constantly, such that the metaphorical loops carry the reader through a terrain that is at once a wor[l]d of its own. Terry Eagleton once suggested that texts have “‘backgrounds’ and ‘foregrounds’, different narrative viewpoints, alternative layers of meaning which we are constantly moving.”[3]
 
In Paul Auster’s  City of Glass, the character Stillman walks the streets of Manhattan making no physical change to the landscape.  However, Quinn surreptitiously records his walking….

For Stillman had not left his message anywhere.  True, he had created the letters by the movement of his steps, but that had not been written down.  It was like drawing a picture in the air with your finger.  The image vanishes as you are making it.  There is no result, no trace to mark what you have done.[4]

Auster touches on the threshold between the desire to discern writing in the landscape, and the nagging sense that such interpretations are just in our minds.  Auster’s Quinn worried that he had “imagined the whole thing.  The letters were not letters at all.  He had seen them only because he had wanted to see them.”[5]  Ego, desire and wild awful need ….

To write with one’s feet?  Pied-á-terre. 

Environmental artist Jacques Simon used his footsteps to scrawl in the snow at the base of the Eiffel Tower: 

And David Lodge’s character Persse, in Small World,  writes the name of his beloved Angelica in the snow with his footsteps.  [6]



 


[1] Paul Auster (1987) The New York Trilogy: City of Glass, Ghosts and The Locked Room.  London: Faber & Faber Limited.  p. 71

[2] Hélène Cixous (1998) What is it o’clock? or The door (we never enter). In Hélène Cixous  Stigmata: Surviving texts.  London: Routledge.  p. 57.

[3] Terry Eagleton (1983) Literary Theory: An Introduction.  Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press, pp.77-78.

[4] Auster, op cit, p. 71

[5] ibid.

[6] David Lodge (1984) Small World. New York: Penguin Books.

 

Posted by JACKY BOWRING at 12:00:00 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, October 3, 2006

THE JOY OF TEXT 2

Writing on the Landscape

“…  we could scarcely bring ourselves to believe it altogether the work of nature.” [1]

 

Like Ovid, Hermes [2] looked up, seeing a flock of cranes flying in arrow formation, and this V form became one of the letters of the Greek alphabet.   Kipling echoes this in his story of how the alphabet was made, imagining the Neolithic construction of letters from landscape clues, such as “a little bit of the winding Wagai River for the nice windy-windy wa-sound” (W).[3]

 

 

 For Edgar Allan Poe’s Arthur Gordon Pym, the apparently natural phenomenon of a series of huge chasms was slowly revealed to have a textual form.  Pym recorded the chasms’ shape as he moved through them, and found a series of indentations on the wall of one of the chasms which bore “some little resemblance to alphabetical characters.”

The precise formation of the chasm will be best understood by means of a delineation taken on the spot; for I had luckily with me a pocketbook and a pencil, which I preserved with great care through a long series of subsequent adventures, and to which I am indebted for memoranda of many subjects which would otherwise have been crowded from my remembrance.  This figure [...] gives the general outlines of the chasm, without the minor cavities in the sides, of which there were several, each cavity having a corresponding protuberance opposite.[4]

Poe describes in the notes how the shapes which the chasms formed “constitute an Ethiopian verbal root ‘To be shady’.”[5]  Thus at both a scale beyond immediate comprehensibility (the chasms themselves), and at a readable size (on the chasm wall), Pym had discovered an encoded message written in the landscape.

 

To be continued…



[1] Edgar Allan Poe, (1992). “The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym,”  In The Complete Stories of Edgar Allan Poe. London: Everyman’s Library, David Campbell Publishers Ltd.  (originally published 1838),  p.222

[2] This story is also attributed to Palemedes and to Apollo, and I’m still unravelling it.

[3]  Rudyard Kipling. (1950)   “How the Alphabet was Made.” In Just So Stories. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd.    (originally published 1902) P.148

[4]  Poe, (1992). “The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym”,  p. 223

[5]  ibid, p. 241

Posted by JACKY BOWRING at 12:00:00 | Permalink | No Comments »

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

THE JOY OF TEXT 1

Writing on the Landscape:

“Nature is a language - can’t you read?” [1]

 

Sea birds are swooping and shrieking overhead - one, it seems, in particular.  He glances up: its wings came close that time, and he does not like the look of its beak.  It soars off into the sky, and he shields his eyes and follows.  Far now, just a speck, it swings in great looping circles, drawing O’s and O’s against the blue.  On and on they go, those circles, graceful and languorous…

Suddenly, with an irrepressible surge of ego, of desire, of wild awful need, Ovid believes the O is for him.  Immaculate, principal, ovate letter!  Yes, it is - it is a sign - showing that he shall be fixed in the sky as he so awfully longs to be: borne aloft, transfigured, forever.

Jane Alison (2001) The Love-Artist.  New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.  p. 237

  

Image:  J. Bowring, Passages: A Sermon in Stone, Punakaiki, Aotearoa New Zealand, 2005

And this our life exempt from public haunt,  

Finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,  

Sermons in stones, and good in every thing.  

I would not change it.

William  Shakespeare, As You Like It, Duke (senior) in the Forest of Arden, Act II. Scene I.   

 

 Image: J.Bowring, Sign of the Traveller: X Track, Gilbraltar Rock, Port Hills, Christchurch, 2006

In Novalis’ The Novices at Sais, one of the travellers refers to nature’s own language, “that great cipher which we discern written everywhere, in wings, egg-shells, clouds and snow, in crystals and in stone formations, on ice-covered waters, on the inside and outside of mountains, plants beasts and men, in the lights of heaven [...]” in Andrew Cunningham and Nicholas Jardine.  (1990) Romanticism and the Sciences.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p.6.   

 

To be continued …

 

 

[1] From the song, “Ask”  on the album Rank, by The Smiths, Rough Trade Records, 1988. 

Posted by JACKY BOWRING at 01:56:41 | Permalink | Comments (1) »